Wiretap Wednesday April 27th, 2016
Topics: Beyonce, #LEMONADE
#RIPPrince
#twitterplayingames
#twitterPAC
#wherestheBern
#feeltheBern
#neverhillary
#neverTrump
#LEMONADE
Call us:
+1(856)67-SULLY
1-856-677-8559
Subscribe on Youtube
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCh9_-j_pfDcatuTh8cWCl2A
APPROPRIATE LINKS:
Phillip DeFranco talking about the beyhive going after Rachael Ray
News Overload in the Philippines as the Election Day draws near and the Presidential and Local Campaign reaches its final phase: Headlines- Countdown to E Day: COMELEC leak, Third Presidential Debate Analysis,
Abu Sayyaf beheads a Canadian Tourist and Clarification on Duterte’s Rape Joke. I apologize if you will hear me cussing or saying bad words in English and Filipino due to out of frustration on the issues today.
Here in the Philippines, we will tackle the hottest issues in the Philippines: Political Dynasty, Graft and Corruption, Senator Grace Poe’s candidacy and the Rise of Mayor Duterte
Social Justice warriors have let the world know that it’s not fair that the rich are treated differently than the poor in court. Yet, some of the same people who were raging against “afluenza” and “white privilege” are now yelling “WE DON’T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT HER EMAILS!” Essentially saying, I want her, the richest, whitest candidate for the Democrats to get a pass, because otherwise we might get one of those unpopular Republicans. Right?
Well, first, lets just put it out there that Democrats don’t need Hillary Clinton, they don’t. Not only do they have a grass roots movement growing for Bernie Sanders but they have two perfectly qualified candidates, both not under federal investigation, waiting in the wings: Elizabeth Warren and Joseph Biden. If Hillary, a criminally negligent, influence peddler (and that’s the nicest assessment) is out of the race, them Democrat party comes out FINE! So, Bernie not giving a damn about those emails is a big problem, not just for Bernie, not just for the Democrats, but for the United States.
Why is it bad for the country? Well, the only candidates talking about holding the multi-millionaire Clinton who has been caught red handed in corrupt dealings is the Republicans. Guess what? People like seeing the rich get their due justice and the Social Justice crowd isn’t for that in this case. The most pro-Bernie activist still talks about Hillary like an aunt they love but don’t want to spend time with at the moment, that’s sweet but childish and ignoring the fact the other people, poorer people are in federal prison for the rest of their lives for doing less then what Hillary did.
What did Hillary do?
A lot of people do not understand this because Hillary has done a good job of confusing people about this. Some think that “She brought her own laptop to work, every does it,” a devout Hillary supporter told me. I had to explain to her that it was not at all the case, Hillary had an entire, very illegal, infrastructure contracted for the sole purpose of keeping her communications with foreign governments and the private sector hidden from the both the Federal Government and the United State public, who she was supposed to be working for.
I broke it down for the young woman like this, “You know when a girl is cheating on her man, she gets a different cell phone so the man doesn’t find out?” She was tracking, I continued, “That’s what Hillary had with the server, but the man is the Federal Government and us, the public and she was cheating on us with big business and foreign governments.”
Hillary didn’t just break some boring email rule- no. That would be like looking a plate-less gang car and thinking, “Boy, the owner of this vehicle sure better get the tags up to date on that car!” and completely ignoring that such a car is likely used for crime. Hillary had the plate-less gang car of bureaucracy. She had a secret way of extorting foreign big money with oil and mineral deals and working over American big business and lobbyist friends. Even very Clinton friendly outlets have had to admit to noticing some of her corruption, not because they want to take her down, but because there is literally so much evidence of her being unethical, they would seem delusional to not acknowledge.
Even devout, born again Clintians at MSNBC have had to report on it, they just pass off all the criticism and suspicion of her on the Republicans…
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/report-state-dept-watchdog-subpoenaed-clinton-foundation-docs
…Sorry MSNBC, it’s not just the Republicans, you cult following suck-ups.
Here’s the Clinton News Network having to drop some reality.
In Conclusion:
Please, people. Wake up. Be critical, seek the social justice the country needs, stick it to the rich white privileged liar that’s been lying to you and wasting your time for years! Press for that justice now, Democrats, press for it now or say hello to the next Republican president.
-gun
I blew up our Vine Channel while out and about in Asia. Enjoy some of these scenery shots and 6 second skits.
Canton, China – on Chinese New Year
The Philippines
Questions? Comments? Complaints?
thepodcaste@gmail.com
As many of you know, I’m a plus sized American male and as much as I loved my travels to The Philippines, I must say, as a liberal, western, socially evolved person, The Philippines needs to be more Body Positive towards people like me. There were chairs that “fat shamed” me and hanging bridges and tiny boats all of which were clearly intolerant of my big and beautiful body type.
Here is a picture of me on a tiny boat: 
Note that I’m by myself on that side of the boat because the boat was so intolerant and set on fat-shaming me that it made other people have to sit on the other side to balance itself. I thought, that’s sound like a “you problem” tiny boat, but whatever. I knew I was not in a position to argue.
This hanging bridge in Bohol was one of the worst “thinspiration” bullies I’ve ever come across! It dramatically swayed and rocked as I approached it’s center. I was embarrassed for it, frankly, that a hanging bridge would be so backwards in this day and age! 
The fat-shaming and bullying didn’t just take place in the Philippines but also on the flight to and from. Airplane chairs are terrible bullies that point out my lack of mobility and increased mass and volume and stairs point out the fact I’m dead lifting the weight of a 2 average people on each knee when ever I walk. I am very disappointed with international travel and hope that it has learned its lesson and stops bullying people like me.
(All of that was sarcasm, I know that I just need to lose weight)
Stay tuned for more, and actually real articles and pieces on Asia
Check out some of our Filipino and Chinese videos on our Vine.co Channel!
Hey everybody. Gun here. I’m snowed in with my wife and everyone who regularly deals with snow is laughing at us. Whatever, these roads are treacherous on a dry, sunny noon thanks to the wacky Road Warrior attitude of the locals. lol. Here’s some news stories on the snow.
http://www.wmal.com/2016/01/22/how-much-snow-is-on-the-ground/
http://wtop.com/winter/2016/01/day-2-heaviest-snowfall-pound-region-early-saturday/
WASHINGTON, DC- With reports of record snow fall in the next few days, DC’s Democrat run city council looks for progressive ways to protect the population of the nation’s capitol. With some brain storming they realized the sure fire way to prevent mass snowing: Snow Free Zones. The city hastily printed thousands of “Snow Free Zone” signs all over the district, letting man and nature know that higher penalties will be in place if they snow in that vicinity. The President applauded this measure and invited the city council to the White House for photo-ops.
The leaning on laws and more gun legislation has been a political crutch and kicking the debate around has been a political soccer ball, but do politicians really want to make the world safer? History would clearly say, “No. No, politicians, especially Democrat politicians, do not want a safer world free of gun crime and gun violence.” History is obviously being a jerk, right? How dare History and his a-hole buddy Facts and his witch girlfriend Statistics all say that big-hearted dems like Pres. Obama, Martin O’Malley and Rahm Emanuel don’t really want to see a safer place to live with less gun crime? How dare they!? Well, in all fairness, history, facts and statistics only show the actual results, not the intention. But, if I saw my brother touch the stove and burn his hand, I should have a reasonable expectation of what would happen if I touch the stove, too. If I touch the stove too, well, I’m stupid or one of those people that like- umm, feeling the burn.
The gun control legislation proposed in Democrat controlled cities always focuses on legal gun owners and sellers and many of them even focus on limiting the right to defend oneself. Gun crime goes up because laws are not magical and criminals don’t follow them. So, people come up with innovations and inventions to help protect their people and does the city say thanks? Well, let’s look at the case of TASER. Taser CEWs (Conducted Energy Weapons) were created to provide an alternative to guns for Law Enforcement and, for the victims of violent criminals, an alternative to being robbed and murdered. How did Baltimore respond? Did they say, “Wow, you’ve used technology to evolve the self-defense debate. That changes things and maybe we should encourage you to continue developing innovative self-defense technology.” HAHAHAHAH no, of course not. Baltimore and DC rushed to OUTLAW Tasers because they are scary, dangerous weapons that could possibly kill people. That’s right, they don’t let the Metropolitan Police department in Washington, DC. carrying Tasers because they are dangerous… THEY CARRY GUNS!- but they are not allowed to carry a Taser because THEY MIGHT KILL SOMEONE! I’m sorry for all the caps but the stupidity is so thick in those facts, it’s suffocating.*
DC, Baltimore and Chicago have again and again proposed and implemented laws that don’t help and then discouraged innovation and invention. Why would they do that? Is it because they want to solve the issue another, even smarter way? Nope, they just keep doing the same failed things. So maybe they don’t want to solve the problem at all? Seems that way, because then you can take that to the next election a tell everyone that “We have all the answers on how to end gun violence and you all have to vote democrat, or you are sure to die in a hail of bullets, because Republicans=Guns and Guns=bad. Vote Democrat! That will solve everything and there’s no need for you, the voter to think about anything else or even be anything but a voter. Voting Democrat will save the world and all the children in it!” Come on, knock it off. Can we just be grown-ups about this and talk about actual prevention measures that could make the world safer?
Things that need to be discussed:
If we evolved, instead of just screaming “guns are bad!” we could live in a world where situations are quelled efficiently and justice is served. Let’s imagine a run-down of three armed men, would-be mass shooters, walking up to the entrance of a mall, the security intercepts them neutralizing 2 of them with non-lethal CEWs and the 3rd escapes capture but is tracked down immediately by police by tracking his digital signature and face thanks to digital video and cellular data image collection. Is that crazy? Well, if you are a Utopian, you’d say it is crazy only because bad people don’t exist and bad things just shouldn’t happen. But, bad people do exist, and they do really bad things sometimes. Whether god, or their neighbor’s dog is commanding them to, bad people do bad things. We can’t read everyone’s mind, but we can encourage innovation and invention in technological advancements of self defense and law enforcement tools.
Sincerely,
Gun Sully
*if anyone read this and thought “TASERs are dangerous, they DO TOO kill people!” I’ll try to be objective here and reply scientifically and honestly: You’re an idiot. Tasers kill people the way showers kill people, the way that they don’t- but you might slip and fall. If you get tazed, then fall down a flight of stairs and die, the TASER didn’t kill you, the fall don’t the stairs did- the alternative is getting shot BY A GUN and dying BEFORE you fall down the stairs. Does that sound better to you? Well, if it does, I respectfully thank you, DC council member, for reading this and would like to remind you of the start of this statement. You’re not smart, so stop outlawing stuff smart people made only because you are a regressive who is scared of technology.
Proof read audio.
learn more about TASER : https://www.taser.com/
Margaret Sanger in Context: A View of “The Pivot of Civilization”
I’ve finished reading The Pivot of Civilization, Margaret Sanger’s book on the need for contraception, sex education, women’s rights, worker’s rights, and benefit of the study of eugenics and the need to sterilize those unfit to reproduce. That’s not being preachy or exaggerating, that’s just the actual topics discussed and as I’m sure you noticed, most of that is fairly agreeable. You can’t call Sanger a monster for wanting workers treated better, people to be more educated and even that the masses should have the option to use prophylactics. The areas I found disgusting were those that cited eugenics, a now debunked race-based study of genetics, as the scientific backbone of her social engineering concepts. Elitism and racism is understood when I read this and the tone is so cold at points I winced.
https://books.google.com/books?id=jhpLAAAAYAAJ&printsec
Good things:
Bad things:
Grey area
Why do I title this Margaret Sanger in Context? Well, people take quotes and snippets here and there and can make any statement from Mrs. Sanger being a genocidal maniac to a Pro-lifer. What’s the truth? The truth is in the context of the book, “The Pivot of Civilization,” where you see her as a classist, elitist, who wants to do some things that aren’t bad but uses eugenics and even Marxist theorems to make her case. As I’ve clearly shown, I don’t disagree with some of her goals but if you are a Planned Parenthood apologist, you need to be able to say with confidence that the good outweighs the bad and don’t try to just childishly deny that the bad ever existed. A belligerent PP advocate tried to deny Mrs. Sanger’s relationship to eugenics and as if they were a fervent religious adherent there was no explaining it to them. It really shut down the conversation because I was aware I was dealing with a “flat-earther” and not a rational person.
To show you how damning quotes can be here’s a short list some of Margaret’s coldest and most elitist statements from the book:
“Eugenics is chiefly valuable in its negative aspects… it shows us that we are paying for and even submitting to the dictates of an ever increasing unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all-”
” Evidences of biological and racial degeneracy are apparent to this observer. “Compared with the African negro,” he writes, “the British sub man is in several respects markedly inferior. He tends to be dull he is usually quite helpless and unhandy; he has, as a rule, no skill or knowledge of handicraft or indeed knowledge of any kind…” “
“Loud mouthed defenders of American democracy pay no attention to the strange fact that although the average education among all American adults is only the sixth grade every one of these adults has an equal power at the polls.”
“Sterilization of the insane and feeble-minded and the encouragement of this operation upon those afflicted with inherited or transmissible diseases, with the understanding that sterilization does not deprive the individual of his or her sex expression, but merely renders him incapable of producing children.”
“We should not minimize the great outstanding service of Eugenics for critical and diagnostic investigations. It demonstrates not in terms of glittering generalization but in statistical studies of investigations reduced to measurement and number, that uncontrolled fertility is universally correlated with disease, poverty, overcrowding and the transmisson of hereditable taints.”
“This degeneration has already begun…(list of societal woes) All these things the Eugenist sees and points out with a courage entirely admirable.”
She seems to like eugenics- but in context she’s actually distancing herself from the eugenics movement as a whole (Shocking Twist!) but not to say they are bad and totally wrong (Twist again!), no, only to say they do not go far enough and to marry the seemingly contradictory concepts of Socialism with the “outstanding” elements of the study of eugenics. So- are these quotes taken out of context? You’ll have to read the book to find out. Honestly, in context, it’s hard to ignore or rationalize away the fact that it’s an elitist woman saying we shouldn’t have to help the poor, they shouldn’t be “spawning.” I’m not really seeing the Liberal Superhero that I was promised.
Here’s a link to a free copy of the book, feel free to read it at your leisure. To the validity of other “monstrous” quotes not in this book, I cannot speak.
thepodcaste 