#FBImWithHer, 3rd Party, bernie sanders, conservatism, corruption, data destruction, Democrats, Donald Trump, Email Scandal, emailgate, FBI, Gary Johnson, Hillary Clinton, podcast, politics, positivity, Republicans, scandal

How Emailgate reminds me of Stanley Kubrick’s death


(listen here or subscribe on iTunes: search “thepodcaste”)

Honest Clinton Campaign Bumper Sticker:



FBI Director James Comey’s statement


Everything’s bad with Hillary’s Emails…



Even Clinton Friendly Washington Post is noticing this is bad!


…and MSNBC.



Is there any hope for the future?  

Yes, this is a call to action, we need a reasonable and measured response and we need to campaign to get the ridiculous amounts of corruption out of government.

More to Come.



I’m going to go ahead and #breakfromnewsbreak here and plug our YouTube channel.  We’ve got some stuff up there now but are going to be piling funny and insightful things up there soon. Watch this video about Dog Donation and subscribe:



#blacklivesmatter, Hillary Clinton, Hot Mike, Muslim Brotherhood, terrorism, Uncategorized

Hillary Clinton Vocally Supported Racist Rapists

In 2011, there was a grassroots movement, started by a Tunisian man lighting himself on fire, called the Arab Spring.  The anti-establishment movement was immediately co-opted by right-wing groups that wanted more men’s rights, more theocratic rule and less progress.  The largest of these groups that proudly claimed to be Arab Spring-ers, was the Muslim Brotherhood.  This group is as right-wing, male-chauvinistic, theocratic and as xenophobic as the Ku Klux Klan and their members have included such memorable characters as Iman Al Zawahiri and Osama Bin Laden.  In a similar arrangement as with the IRA (Terrorist group, Irish Republican Army) and the Sinn Fien (Political body associated with the IRA) in Northern Ireland the MB is the Politcal or father organization for many Sunni Muslim terrorist groups including Ansar Al-Shariah, Hamas and most famously, Al Qaeda.  Hillary Clinton knew exactly who the Muslim Brotherhood was and still overtly and vocally supported them in their take over of Egypt.

This was a strained relationship because it hinged entirely on lying to the American people about the MB during the whole Arab Spring.  The US would have been in a revolt ready uproar if the truth that our government was backing a Hitler-Approved hate group that has the hobby of burning African Churches.  But, Hillary has had such an adoring and fawning media that simply didn’t challenge her when she lied and didn’t question her foreign policy decisions.  She literally said, “We stand with the protesters!” the same day the White House (Biden) stated that we stand with our long time ally, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak.  ABC News reported on that as Vice President Biden, speaking from Washington DC, as ‘gaffing,’ instantly siding with Hillary despite no further clarification from the Executive Branch.  She then sat down with Muslim Brotherhood leaders and declared them as the ‘progressive’ and ‘democratic’ voices of the Egyptian people, completely lying but ABC, NBC, CBS and CNN all supported that narrative.

Western Reporters REPEATEDLY got assault by Muslim Brotherhood protesters:

Since the MB is a hate-group that hates all non-Sunni Moslems, it makes perfect sense that they would not like western media personnel, but this didn’t fit Clinton’s narrative.  The fix was not simple.  After a news reporter gets a concussion or a female reporter gets groped- it was the media’s job to then state that Hosni Mubarak (the long time US ally but now BAD GUY in Clinton’s State Department narrative) supporters had snuck into the crowd and impersonated Muslim Brotherhood protesters and then they, Mubarak supports, assault western reporters, while pretending to be Muslim Brother members.  Confused?  You should be, because that’s just gibberish, gibberish that got reported by US reporters.

Even Fox News, typically not thought to be friendly to democrat agendas, reported the convoluted conspiracy theories that Pres. Hosni Mubarak’s supporters were sneaking into Tahrir square and attacking our journalists.

The Muslim Brotherhood didn’t like the US killing MB member, Osama Bin Laden

The MB organized a massive rally on September 11th, 2012 in Cairo were they not only chanted “Obama Obama We are All Osama!” but they attack the US embassy in Cairo.  Hillary Clinton had the State department blame the protests on a video on Youtube that had not even gone viral in the most generous sense of the word and likely had not been seen by any of the protesters.  For two weeks the media reported the narrative put forth by Hillary’s people that all the attackers were protesters and they were protesting an offensive video.  This narrative, since discovered to be false, is still in Hillary Clinton’s book, Hard Choices.

we are all osama protest

(Don’t believe me?  Just find a copy of Hard Choices, open it up to the pictures and read the caption under this photo, it’s like she doesn’t believe in Video or Audio recording devices!)



The Arab Spring spread and wherever a Sunni Muslim wanted to kill a Shiite or a Christian or a Jew, the Muslim Brotherhood sent support, munitions, and prayers.  Hillary Clinton supported a group that Hitler supported, treated them as a respectable, regional authority and turned a blind eye to the subjugation of their women and even the rape of Western reporters including dutch woman Nina Burleigh and Lara Logan and allow the MB to violently oppress the historic Christian community Native* to Egypt and North Africa.



Here’s 2 theories as to why Hillary Clinton would sabotage the stability of the Middle East so deliberately and so violently:

  • Theory 1:  She knew the “buck stopped” at the President’s desk and hoped he would not be able to handle a second term possibly allowing her to run in 2012.
  • Theory 2:  Hillary had a position of power (Secretary of State of the USA), a way to collect money from foreign governments (Clinton Foundation), a completely unregulated way of communicating with foreign governments (The Illegal Web Servers or “Email Server”) and the fawning support and unwavering trust of an adoring U.S. media.  Having all these things in play, she backs a group, any group to overthrow an ally.  The group she supports is praised, the ally is demonized, the ally is overthrown and then Hillary started getting some ass-kissery in her inbox from dictatorial governments all over the Mid-East accompanying donations to the Clinton Foundation. Donations came in from all over!… except from Qaddafi of course, hmm… guess he should have donated, then the US wouldn’t have been forced to destroy all their infrastructure.
  • Have a different theory?  Let us know! You are part of The Pod Caste, contact us:
    • +1(856)67-SULLY (856-677-8559)
    • thepodcaste@gmail.com



Egypt’s Coptic Christians face an uncertain future


Muslim Brotherhood Memo Encourages Burning Churches in Egypt


Muslim Brotherhood History


Gang rape, the dark side of Egypt’s protests


CBS’ Lara Logan reveals she was stripped, nearly scalped in Egypt sexual assault; women ‘saved’ her



*If you are confuse by use of the word “Native” because you don’t know that Egyptian Christianity is older than Islam in Egypt, please educate yourself.

Trans Pacific Partnership

Juan dela Cruz and Uncle Sam: The Love-Hate Relationship between the United States-Philippines

Philippines – United States relations (Filipino: Ugnayang Pilipinas at Estados Unidos) are bilateral relations between the United States of America and its former colony the Republic of the Philippines. Relations between the United States and the Philippines are strong, historically close and extremely friendly and has also been described as a Special Relationship. The United States is undeniably the Philippines’ closest ally in the world, Philippines being one of United States’ oldest Asian partners and a close strategic major non-NATO ally. Throughout history, there were moments of cooperation and disagreement between Uncle Sam (America) and Juan Dela Cruz (Philippines) and in this article, we will find out the history of this relationship and its importance.

Bases era (1947–91)

Pursuant to the 1947 Military Bases Agreement, the United States maintained and operated major facilities at Clark Air Base until November 1991, and at Subic Bay Naval Complex and several small subsidiary installations in the Philippines until November 1992. In July 1991, negotiators from the two countries reached agreement on a draft treaty providing for the clean-up and turn over of Clark to the Philippine government in 1992, and for the lease of Subic Bay Naval Base by the U.S. for ten years.[9] By 1991, operations at Clark had already been scaled back because of the end of the Cold War, with the last combat aircraft leaving in 1990, before the base was heavily damaged by the 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo.

On September 16, 1991, the Philippine Senate rejected the bases treaty by a slim margin, and despite further efforts to salvage the situation, the two sides could not reach an agreement. As a result, the Philippine Government informed the U.S. on December 6, 1991, that it would have one year to complete withdrawal. That withdrawal went smoothly and was completed ahead of schedule, with the last U.S. forces departing on November 24, 1992. On departure, the U.S. Government turned over assets worth more than $1.3 billion to the Philippines, including an airport and ship-repair facility. Agencies formed by the Philippine Government have converted the former military bases for civilian commercial use, with Subic Bay serving as a flagship for that effort. The Philippine government on July 16, 2015 announced that it will revive a US-built deep-water naval base in Subic Bay.



Purple State Mini-Podcast: Vote for or against?

Gun talks out primary voting in a battle ground state with author Brian Sanchez (The AAAR, Ushumenti) and whether to vote for a candidate you like or vote against a candidate you don’t.  It’s a great conversation!  Brian is a fount of wisdom on the subject and a fresh perspective.

Obama, Uncategorized

The Unevolved Response to Gun Violence

The leaning on laws and more gun legislation has been a political crutch and kicking the debate around has been a political soccer ball, but do politicians really want to make the world safer?  History would clearly say, “No.  No, politicians, especially Democrat politicians, do not want a safer world free of gun crime and gun violence.”  History is obviously being a jerk, right?  How dare History and his a-hole buddy Facts and his witch girlfriend Statistics all say that big-hearted dems like Pres. Obama, Martin O’Malley and Rahm Emanuel don’t really want to see a safer place to live with less gun crime?  How dare they!?  Well, in all fairness, history, facts and statistics only show the actual results, not the intention.  But, if I saw my brother touch the stove and burn his hand, I should have a reasonable expectation of what would happen if I touch the stove, too.  If I touch the stove too, well, I’m stupid or one of those people that like- umm, feeling the burn.

The gun control legislation proposed in Democrat controlled cities always focuses on legal gun owners and sellers and many of them even focus on limiting the right to defend oneself.  Gun crime goes up because laws are not magical and criminals don’t follow them.  So, people come up with innovations and inventions to help protect their people and does the city say thanks?  Well, let’s look at the case of TASER.  Taser CEWs (Conducted Energy Weapons) were created to provide an alternative to guns for Law Enforcement and, for the victims of violent criminals, an alternative to being robbed and murdered.  How did Baltimore respond?  Did they say, “Wow, you’ve used technology to evolve the self-defense debate.  That changes things and maybe we should encourage you to continue developing innovative self-defense technology.”  HAHAHAHAH no, of course not.  Baltimore and DC rushed to OUTLAW Tasers because they are scary, dangerous weapons that could possibly kill people.  That’s right, they don’t let the Metropolitan Police department in Washington, DC. carrying Tasers because they are dangerous…  THEY CARRY GUNS!- but they are not allowed to carry a Taser because THEY MIGHT KILL SOMEONE!  I’m sorry for all the caps but the stupidity is so thick in those facts, it’s suffocating.*

DC, Baltimore and Chicago have again and again proposed and implemented  laws that don’t help and then discouraged innovation and invention.  Why would they do that?  Is it because they want to solve the issue another, even smarter way?  Nope, they just keep doing the same failed things.  So maybe they don’t want to solve the problem at all?  Seems that way, because then you can take that to the next election a tell everyone that “We have all the answers on how to end gun violence and you all have to vote democrat, or you are sure to die in a hail of bullets, because Republicans=Guns and Guns=bad.  Vote Democrat!  That will solve everything and there’s no need for you, the voter to think about anything else or even be anything but a voter.  Voting Democrat will save the world and all the children in it!”  Come on, knock it off.  Can we just be grown-ups about this and talk about actual prevention measures that could make the world safer?

Things that need to be discussed:

  • Effective yet “less-lethal” alternatives for self-defense and law enforcement
  • Advancements in screening and weapons detection
  • Surveillance advancements including Hi-def facial recognition and digital war-driving

If we evolved, instead of just screaming “guns are bad!” we could live in a world where situations are quelled efficiently and justice is served.  Let’s imagine a run-down of three armed men, would-be mass shooters, walking up to the entrance of a mall, the security intercepts them neutralizing 2 of them with non-lethal CEWs and the 3rd escapes capture but is tracked down immediately by police by tracking his digital signature and face thanks to digital video and cellular data image collection.   Is that crazy?  Well, if you are a Utopian, you’d say it is crazy only because bad people don’t exist and bad things just shouldn’t happen.  But, bad people do exist, and they do really bad things sometimes. Whether god, or their neighbor’s dog is commanding them to, bad people do bad things.  We can’t read everyone’s mind, but we can encourage innovation and invention in technological advancements of self defense and law enforcement tools.


Gun Sully

*if anyone read this and thought “TASERs are dangerous, they DO TOO kill people!” I’ll try to be objective here and reply scientifically and honestly:  You’re an idiot.  Tasers kill people the way showers kill people, the way that they don’t- but you might slip and fall.  If you get tazed, then fall down a flight of stairs and die, the TASER didn’t kill you, the fall don’t the stairs did- the alternative  is getting shot BY A GUN and dying BEFORE you fall down the stairs.  Does that sound better to you?  Well, if it does, I respectfully thank you, DC council member, for reading this and would like to remind you of the start of this statement.  You’re not smart, so stop outlawing stuff smart people made only because you are a regressive who is scared of technology.

Proof read audio.


learn more about TASER : https://www.taser.com/

2nd Ammendment, politics

Schrödinger’s Gun Free Zone

There’s been a big focus on gun control and ways to stop gun crime recently.  One of the 1st common sense Gun Control laws I see as needed are rules against posting signs stating “Gun Free Zone” in areas where absolutely no entry control protocols and routine screenings are in place.

Many of the “Mass shootings” that Pres. Obama talks about so much and has even been seen crying over have taken place in “Gun Free” zones.  If a building manager posts such a sign without implementing intense security measures, they provide the patrons with a false sense of security.  The only way one should legally be aloud to declare an area a GFZ is if they have an armed officer or officers posted at entrances with a metal detector.

If areas truly want to prevent people from entering their theaters with guns, they need to logically approach the subject because a sign that says something is not a magical talisman that wards off danger.  Instead of magic, someone walking out of a GFZ movie theater alive is merely the chance survival of Schrödinger’s cat, the only difference is Schrödinger wouldn’t have been so presumptive to mark the box “Alive Cat Zone.”

So, if you are to continue you posting GFZ signs you will need to amend it to state:  “This is simultaneously an armed area and a gun free zone until you either survive or are shot.” Seem ridiculous?  So are fake Gun Free Zones.

In the meantime, I’m not going to go to work, I’m just going to fasten a “Rent Free Zone” sign on my door.  I’m sure my leasing office will understand the same way mass shooters understood GFZ signs.what makes a zone gun free

politics, Uncategorized

The Podcaste Exclusive: Pres. Obama Explain Strategy on ISIS

THE PENTAGON:  President Obama met with military leaders in the Pentagon today to explain his strategy against the Islamic State.  “Instead of fighting them like the King of Jordan or Russia, just clumsily punching them with bombs, we will wage a smarter war, like how I deal with the Republicans.”  Obama ignored all the maps and ground intelligence reports the generals had prepared for him and had staffers enter the room with some campaign charts.  “What we need to do is never act on substance or attack directly, but instead make a straw ISIL, in a straw city, populated entirely of straw jihadists, then we bomb that straw man enemy to hell!”

preferred target

Pictured: Pres. Obama’s preferred target

Obama explained that the administration’s preferred target is never the actual person but merely a cartoonish straw man that he creates, such as calling Republicans cowards who are afraid of widows and orphans instead of answering the most basic questions of national security concerns that they bring up.  It has also worked to quell bi-partisan arguments by the administration merely ignoring the Democrats involved in the situation and instead calling all who oppose the will of the president “Petty Partisan Republicans,” like what they did to Chuck Schumer and many other Dem leaders who opposed the Iran deal.


“The straw man attack is the only attack I’ve used and it’s worked well so far!  So get out there, make-up a fake and easy target and attack it!”